| Fraser Institute's Report Card ranks private schools as Burnaby's top five |
|
|
|
| Written by Administrator |
| Sunday, 20 June 2010 05:19 |
|
An open dialogue on what’s happening in Burnaby schools, neighbourhoods and backyards, from the personal to the political and everything in between.
Fraser Institute's Report Card ranks private schools as Burnaby's top fiveIt's always a topic that gets people's blood boiling in Burnaby. The Fraser Institute released its annual Report Card today, a ranking of 876 public and private schools in B.C. What is the Report Card exactly? The Fraser Institute takes the results from the Foundation Skills Assessment tests, (the annual provincewide reading, writing and math tests for grades 4 and 7 students) and uses them to rank and compare schools. (They also include demographic data: parental income and the number of ESL and special needs students.) The FSA tests are intended to give the government a snapshot of how B.C. students are doing. The B.C. Teachers' Federation opposes the test and has been aggressively campaigning against them for years. One of the main reasons is because if they were scrapped, the Fraser Institute would have nothing to rank the schools. And ranking the schools is "unfair, damaging, and inappropriate" according to president Irene Lanzinger. The teachers argue the Report Card favours private schools while undermining confidence in the public system, a system already suffering from underfunding. The Fraser Institute says parents want the information, that the report helps parents compare and chose schools, and the ranking encourages schools to improve. Anyway, read the story in Saturday's paper for the rest of the arguments and our local school board chair's response. The Report Card tends to reflect socioeconomic status, (poor schools rank low, private rank high) but the Fraser Institute communications guy pointed out an anomaly: Also, readers may have noticed some of the Black Press papers (our competition) ran the story already. They made a deal to run the report in the paper in exchange for getting the results early. Usually that deal is made with The Vancouver Sun (part of our company) but they don't have the space this year because of the Olympics coverage. For the record, I oppose that practice for any paper, including ours. It's no different than paying for information, in this case with ad space, something journalists are ethically forbidden to do. But with the industry in rough shape and papers hurting for revenue, I'm sure we'll see more pressure to throw ethics out the window. |
| Last Updated on Sunday, 20 June 2010 05:21 |


